Dr. Wale Ajewunmi, a prominent civil and political rights activist, has urged former Speaker of the Lagos State House of Assembly, Mudashiru Obasa, to refrain from making statements and actions that could stir unrest in the state.
Ajewunmi, in a statement on Saturday, also called on the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Lagos to rein in Obasa, warning that his recent remarks could threaten the peace in the state.
The activist’s comments followed Obasa’s defiant claim that he remains the Speaker of the Lagos House of Assembly, despite being removed by 32 of his colleagues.
Obasa, who had been warmly welcomed by his supporters after returning from Abuja, contended that his removal had not followed due process and vowed to announce his next course of action in the days ahead.
In response, Ajewunmi advised Obasa not to allow himself to be manipulated by those encouraging his self-destruction.
He emphasised that the removal of a Speaker is not the same as the impeachment of a governor.
“If he wishes to draw comparisons with the position of a governor, it indicates a lack of proper advice,” Ajewunmi said.
Referring to the Nigerian constitution, he quoted Section 92(c) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), which states that the Speaker or Deputy Speaker of a House of Assembly shall vacate their office if removed by a resolution of the House, passed by a two-thirds majority vote.
Ajewunmi addressed Obasa’s claim that the procedure for his removal was flawed, noting that it was not a constitutional requirement for the Speaker to be present during the removal process.
He pointed out that, during the removal of Speaker Jokotola Pelumi, the Deputy Speaker, Hon. Farouk Oshodi, presided, even though Pelumi was absent.
The activist stressed that the constitution permits the House to change its leadership at any time, provided a two-thirds majority of members present vote for the change.
Ajewunmi also highlighted that the motion for Obasa’s removal did not use the term “impeachment,” further underscoring the validity of the process.
“The removal was fully constitutional and valid,” Ajewunmi stated. “Instead of contesting the decision, Obasa should have shown appreciation to his colleagues, not positioned himself for further conflict.”
